Why Not All “Add-Backs” Are Treated Equally by Banks

Two business professionals working at a table, one typing on a laptop while the other checks a smartphone and holds a coffee cup in an office setting.

Add-backs are common in funeral home financial statements, especially when owners are preparing a business for sale or refinancing. In simple terms, add backs are expenses that are removed from reported earnings to show a clearer picture of what the business might earn under different ownership or management. While this concept is widely understood, banks evaluate add-backs much more carefully than many sellers or buyers expect.

From a lender’s perspective, the key question is not whether an add back exists, but whether it is sustainable and realistic. Banks assess add-backs based on several factors, including recurrence and consistency, documentation and support, and the impact the adjustment would have on ongoing operations. An add back that is truly one-time or clearly discretionary is viewed very differently than an expense that is essential to running the business.

Two business professionals reviewing information on a tablet during a meeting, with a woman explaining details while a man points at the screen.

For example, a one-time legal expense or an unusual repair may be a reasonable add-back if it is well documented and unlikely to recur. On the other hand, removing core operating costs such as maintenance, staffing, or marketing because they were temporarily reduced can create a misleading picture of profitability. Banks are trying to understand what the business will look like under normal, sustainable operations, not under best-case or artificially lean conditions.

Common pitfalls arise when personal expenses are assumed to disappear without a clear plan, when temporary cost savings are treated as permanent, or when adjustments are not clearly explained or supported. In these cases, lenders will often reverse or partially reverse the add-backs and adjust cash flow to reflect what they believe is a more realistic operating scenario.

Documentation matters. Clear explanations, historical context, and supporting records all increase the credibility of an add-back. When a bank can see why an expense is being adjusted and why that adjustment makes sense going forward, it is far more likely to accept it in the underwriting analysis.

It is also important to remember that add-backs are not just about increasing numbers. They are about improving clarity. Well-supported, reasonable add-backs help a lender understand the true earning power of the business. Aggressive or poorly supported adjustments, however, often have the opposite effect and can reduce lender confidence or lead to more conservative loan structures.

The practical takeaway is straightforward: not all add-backs are created equal. The more realistic, documented, and sustainable the adjustment, the more likely it is to be credited in underwriting. The goal is not to present the rosiest picture possible, but the most accurate one.

About the Author

Matt Manske is a bank loan officer with over 20 years of experience specializing in funeral home financing. He works directly with borrowers to structure transactions that align with real-world bank underwriting. Additional educational resources can be found at www.funeralhomeloan.com

Need Expert Help with Funeral Home Financing?

Reading about SBA 7(a), SBA 504, and commercial loans is just the first step. Every funeral home purchase or refinance is unique, and the right loan structure depends on your financials, property, and goals. At FuneralHomeLoan.com, we’ve helped hundreds of funeral directors nationwide secure the best possible financing terms.

+19133432357
Scroll to Top